Smith & Wesson M&P9 M2.0 9mm 5" Barrel 17-Rounds Flat Dark Earth For Sale

Why M&amp,P 2.0 is better than Glock?

The comparison between the M&P 2.0 (from Smith & Wesson) and a Glock model depends on specific criteria such as ergonomics, features, personal preference, and intended use. Here are some points where the M&P 2.0 might be considered better by some users:

1. **Ergonomics**: The M&P 2.0 is often praised for its comfortable grip and ergonomics, which can offer a more natural and secure hold for some shooters.

2. **Grip Texture**: The M&P 2.0 features an aggressive grip texture that can enhance control and stability during shooting, which some might prefer over Glock’s texture.

3. **Trigger**: Some shooters prefer the trigger pull and reset of the M&P 2.0, which is generally regarded as having improved over its predecessor and even some Glock models.

4. **Modularity**: With interchangeable backstraps, the M&P 2.0 offers more customization for grip size, allowing for a better fit for various hand sizes.

5. **Aesthetics**: Design preferences are subjective, but some users prefer the aesthetics and lines of the M&P 2.0 over Glock’s more utilitarian appearance.

6. **Barrel and Accuracy**: The M&P 2.0 is noted for its precision with a 1:10 twist rate and a rigid chassis, potentially enhancing accuracy.

7. **Price**: Depending on the specific models and sales, the M&P 2.0 can sometimes be more affordable than comparable Glock models.

Ultimately, the choice between an M&P 2.0 and a Glock will depend on personal preference, how the firearm feels in your hand, and specific requirements you might have. Both brands produce reliable and well-respected firearms, so it’s often recommended to test each personally to determine your preference.

Is the M&amp,P 2.0 discontinued?

The M&P 2.0 series, produced by Smith & Wesson, is still in production and has not been discontinued. However, availability can vary based on specific models or configurations within the M&P 2.0 lineup. For the most current information, it’s best to check directly with Smith & Wesson or authorized dealers.

Is an M&amp,P 2.0 a good gun?

The Smith & Wesson M&P (Military & Police) 2.0 is generally considered a good handgun, valued for its reliability, ergonomic design, accuracy, and improved features over the original M&P series. It is widely used by law enforcement and civilian shooters alike. However, whether it is a “good” gun can depend on individual preferences, intended use, and experience level. If possible, trying it out yourself before purchasing can help determine if it suits your needs.

How many rounds can a M&amp,P 2.0 hold?

The Smith & Wesson M&P 2.0, depending on the specific model and caliber, typically has a magazine capacity ranging from 10 to 17 rounds for 9mm and up to 15 rounds for .40 S&W. Always verify with the specific model specifications, as local laws may also affect magazine capacity.

Which is more reliable, Glock or Smith and Wesson?

Both Glock and Smith & Wesson are reputable firearm manufacturers known for producing reliable weapons. Glock is particularly recognized for its durability, simplicity, and widespread use among law enforcement agencies worldwide. Smith & Wesson is well-regarded for its craftsmanship and has a long history in the firearms industry, offering a wide range of models suitable for various purposes.

Reliability can depend on specific models and use cases, so the choice between them may come down to personal preference, intended use, and individual model performance. It’s advisable for users to consider these factors, try both brands if possible, and consult reviews and expert opinions to determine which is more reliable for their particular needs.

What ammo does a M&amp,P 2.0 use?

The M&P 2.0 typically uses 9mm ammunition, although it is available in other calibers as well, such as .40 S&W and .45 ACP. Always verify the specific model for compatibility with the desired caliber.

What does M&amp,P stand for?

M&P typically stands for “Management and Professional.” It is often used to describe a category of employees or roles within an organization that involves managerial and professional responsibilities.

Is the M&amp,P 2.0 single or double action?

The M&P 2.0 (Smith & Wesson M&P M2.0) is a striker-fired pistol, which means it operates with a type of action that is similar to double action.

Does the M&amp,P 2.0 have a trigger safety?

Yes, the M&P 2.0 features a trigger safety as part of its design to enhance user safety and prevent accidental discharge.

Is the M&amp,P 2.0 a full-size pistol?

Yes, the M&P 2.0 is available as a full-size pistol, as well as in other sizes such as compact and subcompact.

What is the effective range of a Smith and Wesson 9mm?

The effective range of a Smith & Wesson 9mm, such as the M&P9, is typically around 50 meters (approximately 55 yards) for accurate shooting. However, skilled shooters may achieve effective performance at slightly longer distances under favorable conditions.

What is the difference between M&amp,P 2.0 and shield?

The difference between M&P 2.0 and the Shield typically refers to two different handgun models produced by Smith & Wesson. Here’s a comparison:

1. **Size and Design:**
– **M&P 2.0**: This is a full-size or compact series of pistols designed for duty, home defense, or competition. They usually feature a larger frame and longer barrel.
– **Shield**: This is a subcompact pistol, designed for concealed carry. It’s smaller, lighter, and more easily concealable than the full-size M&P models.

2. **Capacity:**
– **M&P 2.0**: Generally offers higher ammunition capacity due to the larger frame (e.g., 15+1 or 17+1 rounds for 9mm versions).
– **Shield**: Typically has a lower capacity due to its compact size (e.g., 7+1 or 8+1 rounds for 9mm versions).

3. **Weight:**
– **M&P 2.0**: Heavier due to the larger size, which can help with recoil management.
– **Shield**: Lighter, enhancing its suitability for concealed carry.

4. **Customization and Features:**
– **M&P 2.0**: Offers more customization options like an interchangeable grip system, and some models come with performance enhancements such as threaded barrels or optics-ready slides.
– **Shield**: While some variations feature options like an integrated laser, it generally has fewer customization options compared to the full-size or compact models.

5. **Use Case:**
– **M&P 2.0**: Ideal for settings where size and capacity are prioritized, like law enforcement or home defense.
– **Shield**: Best suited for personal protection and situations where discretion is necessary, like everyday concealed carry.

Both models share reliability, ergonomic design, and quality construction but serve different purposes based on their form factors and capacity.

Why didn’t the military choose Glock?

The U.S. military did not choose Glock for its Modular Handgun System (MHS) program for a variety of reasons. Ultimately, the military selected the Sig Sauer P320 as the winner of the MHS contract. Here are a few potential reasons why Glock was not chosen:

1. **Modularity Requirements:** The military’s MHS program emphasized the need for modularity in its new sidearm. Sig Sauer’s P320 offered a highly modular design that could easily be adapted to different grip sizes and calibers, which may have given it an advantage.

2. **Cost Considerations:** Cost can be a significant factor in military procurement. If Sig Sauer provided an equally competitive offering at a lower cost, it could have influenced the decision.

3. **Specific Requirements:** The military had specific requirements for the competition, which might have been better met by the features or capabilities offered by Sig Sauer, such as ergonomics, safety features, or compatibility with other military gear.

4. **Testing Performance:** During the rigorous testing and evaluation process, the Sig Sauer P320 might have outperformed the Glock entry in areas such as reliability, accuracy, or durability.

5. **Preference for Innovation:** The military could have perceived Sig Sauer’s offering as more innovative or better aligned with their future needs, which may have included considerations for integrating future technology.

Ultimately, while Glock is a highly respected manufacturer with a strong reputation, military procurement decisions are made based on a complex assessment of various factors, and Sig Sauer’s P320 was determined to be the best fit for the specific needs of the U.S. military at the time.

What Glock is comparable to the M&amp,P Shield?

The Glock 43 is often compared to the M&P Shield. Both are popular choices for concealed carry due to their similar size, weight, and caliber options.

What is the difference between M&amp,P 2.0 and shield?

The difference between M&P 2.0 and Shield typically refers to two different product lines within the Smith & Wesson family of firearms. Here’s a brief overview:

1. **M&P 2.0**:
– The M&P (Military and Police) 2.0 is a full-size or compact pistol series intended for duty, personal protection, and competitive shooting.
– It features upgrades from the original M&P series, including an enhanced trigger, more aggressive grip texture, and improved ergonomics.
– It is available in various calibers (such as 9mm, .40 S&W, and .45 ACP) and configurations (including models with or without manual safeties, different barrel lengths, etc.).

2. **Shield**:
– The M&P Shield is a subcompact, slimline pistol designed primarily for concealed carry.
– It is smaller and lighter than the full-size or compact M&P models, making it easier to carry discreetly.
– The Shield is available in several calibers (such as 9mm, .40 S&W, and .45 ACP) and may also feature certain enhancements similar to the 2.0 series, like grip texture upgrades.

Both the M&P 2.0 and Shield are designed for personal defense, but their size, capacity, and intended use cases mark their primary differences. The choice between them often depends on the user’s specific needs regarding size, capacity, and concealability.