Is an M&,P 2.0 a good gun?
The Smith & Wesson M&P (Military & Police) 2.0 series is generally well-regarded for its reliability, ergonomics, and features. It is known for having a comfortable grip, good accuracy, and a durable build. Many users appreciate its improved trigger system compared to earlier models, as well as its adaptability with various sights and accessories.
Whether it is a “good” gun depends on individual needs and preferences, such as the intended use (self-defense, sport shooting, etc.), budget, and comfort with the firearm. As always, it’s important for potential buyers to try handling and shooting the firearm to ensure it meets their personal criteria.
Is the M&,P 2.0 discontinued?
Yes, the Smith & Wesson M&P 2.0 is not discontinued. It is still available in various models and configurations.
Why M&,P 2.0 is better than Glock?
The M&P 2.0 and Glock pistols each have their own sets of advantages, and whether one is “better” than the other can depend on personal preference and specific needs. Here are some reasons why some people might prefer the M&P 2.0 over a Glock:
1. **Ergonomics**: The M&P 2.0 is often praised for its comfortable grip with more aggressive texturing, making it easier to maintain a firm hold, especially in adverse conditions.
2. **Trigger**: The newer M&P 2.0 models have an improved trigger with a crisper break and more tactile reset compared to previous versions, which some shooters prefer over the Glock’s trigger.
3. **Aesthetics and Variation**: The M&P 2.0 offers more customization options, including different colors and sizes, which might appeal to those seeking a personalized firearm.
4. **Steel Insert**: The M&P 2.0 includes a steel insert in the frame to reduce flex and provide better durability, potentially improving long-term reliability.
5. **Ambidextrous Controls**: The M&P 2.0 features ambidextrous slide stops, appealing to left-handed shooters or those seeking versatility in handling.
It’s important to note that both brands are highly respected and renowned for their reliability and performance. Prospective buyers should consider handling both to determine personal preference and fit.
Is M&,P 2.0 full size?
The phrase “M&P 2.0” likely refers to the Smith & Wesson M&P (Military and Police) 2.0 series of firearms. Within this series, there are multiple models and variations, including full-size, compact, and subcompact options. The full-size model in the M&P 2.0 series is indeed a full-size handgun. If you are asking about a specific model, more details would be helpful for accuracy.
Which is better, Glock or S&,W?
The answer to whether Glock or Smith & Wesson (S&W) is better depends on personal preference, intended use, and specific needs. Here are some points to consider:
1. **Reliability**:
– **Glock**: Known for simplicity and reliability, often praised for functioning well even in adverse conditions.
– **S&W**: Generally well-regarded for reliability, though preferences may vary by model.
2. **Ergonomics**:
– **Glock**: Some users find the grip angle less comfortable, while others appreciate its uniformity across models.
– **S&W**: Often praised for its ergonomic grip design, particularly in the M&P series.
3. **Variety**:
– **Glock**: Offers a relatively focused selection, mainly centered on semi-automatic pistols.
– **S&W**: Has a more varied lineup including revolvers, semi-automatics, and other firearms.
4. **Trigger**:
– **Glock**: Known for a consistent trigger pull, but some users seek aftermarket upgrades.
– **S&W**: Many users find the M&P trigger satisfactory, with options for performance center upgrades.
5. **Aftermarket Support**:
– **Both** brands enjoy extensive aftermarket support, allowing for customization.
Ultimately, the decision should be based on which firearm feels more comfortable in your hand, fits your intended purpose (e.g., concealed carry, home defense, range use), and meets your personal preferences. Testing both in a controlled environment like a range can also be a helpful step in making an informed choice.
How many rounds can a M&,P 2.0 hold?
The M&P (Military & Police) 2.0 series by Smith & Wesson offers various models with differing capacities. Generally, the standard M&P M2.0 pistols can hold anywhere between 10 to 17 rounds, depending on the specific model and configuration. It’s important to check the exact specifications of the specific model you are interested in for precise capacity.
What does M&,P stand for?
M&P typically stands for “Methods and Procedures.”
Is the M&,P 2.0 single or double action?
The M&P 2.0 is a striker-fired pistol, which functions as a double-action firearm.
What ammo does a M&,P 2.0 use?
The M&P 2.0 typically uses 9mm, .40 S&W, or .45 ACP ammunition, depending on the specific model you have. Always check your firearm’s specifications to ensure you’re using the correct ammunition.
Why didn’t the military choose Glock?
The decision by a military organization not to choose Glock as their standard-issue sidearm can be influenced by a variety of factors. These can include:
1. **Performance and Suitability:** Other firearms may have outperformed Glock models in testing for reliability, accuracy, or durability under specific conditions that meet the military’s operational requirements.
2. **Cost and Budget Constraints:** Glock may have been more expensive or offered less favorable financial terms compared to competing manufacturers.
3. **Specific Requirements:** The military may have had specific requirements that Glock did not meet, such as modularity, adaptability to different calibers, or compatibility with existing equipment.
4. **Field Trials and Feedback:** Feedback from field tests and current military personnel might have favored another option based on ergonomics, ease of maintenance, or perceived effectiveness.
5. **Political and Strategic Considerations:** Decisions could also be influenced by political factors, including strategic alliances and the desire to support domestic manufacturers or those from allied countries.
6. **Maintenance and Support:** The chosen firearm might offer better logistical support, easier maintenance processes, or superior warranty and customer service terms.
The specific reasons can vary significantly depending on the particular branch of the military, the procurement process, and the competitors involved.
What is the difference between M&,P 2.0 and shield?
M&P 2.0 and Shield are both lines of pistols produced by Smith & Wesson, but they have distinct differences:
1. **Size and Purpose:**
– **M&P 2.0**: This is part of the Military & Police line and is available in various sizes including full-size, compact, and subcompact versions. It is versatile and designed for a range of uses including duty, home defense, and competitive shooting.
– **Shield**: Specifically designed for concealed carry, the Shield is more compact and slim. It is lightweight, making it easier to carry discretely on a daily basis.
2. **Capacity:**
– **M&P 2.0**: These pistols typically offer a higher magazine capacity compared to the Shield, accommodating more rounds suitable for extended use.
– **Shield**: Due to its compact size, the Shield generally has a lower capacity, though extended magazines can increase capacity slightly.
3. **Grip and Ergonomics:**
– **M&P 2.0**: Features aggressive grip texturing and interchangeable palm swell inserts to better fit different hand sizes.
– **Shield**: Offers a more streamlined grip designed for ease of concealment, but with less aggressive texture compared to the M&P 2.0.
4. **Features and Variants:**
– **M&P 2.0**: Includes enhancements such as a more rigid chassis system to reduce flex, a crisper trigger, and various versions accommodating different barrel lengths and calibers.
– **Shield**: Also has variants including performance center models with improved triggers and sights, but overall remains simpler due to its primary design purpose of concealment.
5. **Customization:**
– **M&P 2.0**: Offers more options for customization with a variety of aftermarket parts available, suitable for those who want to tailor their pistol for specific needs.
– **Shield**: Limited in customization compared to M&P 2.0 due to its size and intended use.
In summary, the M&P 2.0 is designed for users looking for versatility and higher capacity, whereas the Shield focuses on providing a compact and easily concealable option for personal defense.
Why Glock is still the best?
The Glock is often considered one of the best handguns for several reasons:
1. **Reliability**: Glock pistols are renowned for their reliability and ability to function under various conditions, including harsh environments and rigorous use.
2. **Simplicity**: Their straightforward design, with fewer parts compared to other firearms, simplifies maintenance and reduces the likelihood of malfunctions.
3. **Durability**: Constructed with high-quality materials, including a polymer frame and a durable finish, Glocks are built to last.
4. **Ease of Use**: The pistols are user-friendly, with an intuitive point-and-shoot design that appeals to both new and experienced shooters.
5. **Versatility**: Available in various calibers and sizes, Glock offers models suitable for various purposes, from law enforcement to personal defense.
6. **Widespread Adoption**: Many law enforcement agencies and military units around the world use Glock pistols, a testament to their reliability and performance.
7. **Aftermarket Support**: The popularity of Glock pistols has led to a vast array of aftermarket parts and accessories, facilitating customization and upgrades.
These factors contribute to Glock’s reputation as a top choice among firearms enthusiasts and professionals alike.
What year did the M&,P 2.0 come out?
The Smith & Wesson M&P 2.0 was introduced in 2017.
What ammo does a M&,P 2.0 use?
The M&P 2.0 typically uses 9mm, .40 S&W, or .45 ACP ammunition, depending on the specific model. Always check the specific model to ensure compatibility with the intended ammunition.
Is the M&,P 2.0 single or double stack?
The M&P 2.0 (Smith & Wesson M&P M2.0) is a series of semi-automatic pistols that are typically double-stack, meaning they hold more rounds in a wider magazine compared to a single stack design.
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.