Smith and Wesson M&P9 M2.0 9mm 4.6-inch Threaded Barrel 17 Rounds Tall Sights No Thumb Safety For Sale

Why M&amp,P 2.0 is better than Glock?

Choosing between the M&P 2.0 and a Glock depends on various factors, as both have their own strengths. However, here are some reasons why someone might prefer the M&P 2.0 over a Glock:

1. **Ergonomics**: The M&P 2.0 often receives praise for its grip ergonomics and overall feel in hand, sometimes deemed more comfortable than a Glock for some shooters.

2. **Grip Texture**: The M&P 2.0 features more aggressive grip texturing, which can provide a secure hold even in wet or sweaty conditions.

3. **Trigger**: Some users find the trigger on the M&P 2.0 to be superior out of the box, with a crisp break and a tactile reset.

4. **Aesthetic Design**: Personal preference plays a role, and some people simply prefer the aesthetics of the M&P 2.0.

5. **Steel Reinforced Frame**: The M&P 2.0 has a steel-reinforced frame, which adds durability and can reduce felt recoil.

6. **Sight Options**: The M&P 2.0 often comes with metal sights compared to the polymer sights typically found on standard Glocks.

7. **Price**: Depending on the model and location, the M&P 2.0 might offer better value for the money.

Ultimately, the choice between the two can come down to personal preference, hand fit, and specific needs or use cases.

Is the M&amp,P 2.0 discontinued?

Yes, the Smith & Wesson M&P 2.0 handgun has not been discontinued. It is still in production and available as of the latest information.

Is the MP9 a good gun?

The MP9 is a compact submachine gun that is widely regarded for its lightweight design, high rate of fire, and versatility in close-quarters situations. Manufactured by Brügger & Thomet, it is favored by various law enforcement and military units around the world. Its merits include ease of handling, maneuverability, and the ability to be suppressed. However, whether it is considered “good” may depend on the specific requirements and preferences of the user, such as desired range, accuracy, and situational use. It is well-suited for roles that demand quick response and mobility, but might not be the best choice for long-range engagements.

How many rounds can a M&amp,P 2.0 hold?

The Smith & Wesson M&P 2.0, which is available in various models, usually has differing magazine capacities based on the specific model and its chambering. For example:

– The M&P M2.0 9mm variant can typically hold 15 to 17 rounds.
– The M&P M2.0 in .40 S&W generally holds 13 to 15 rounds.
– The M&P M2.0 in .45 ACP usually has a magazine capacity of around 10 rounds.

These capacities can also vary with state-specific compliance models that have restrictions on magazine capacity. It is always best to check the specifications of the particular model you are interested in.

Which is more reliable, Glock or Smith and Wesson?

Both Glock and Smith & Wesson are reputable firearms manufacturers known for their quality and reliability. The choice between the two often comes down to personal preference, intended use, and specific model comparisons. Glock is renowned for its simplicity, durability, and widespread use in law enforcement and military applications. Smith & Wesson, on the other hand, offers a wide range of firearms, including highly regarded revolvers and semi-automatic pistols. To determine which is more reliable for your needs, consider factors such as ergonomics, intended use, historical performance, and user reviews. Ultimately, it’s advisable to handle and test models from both brands to see which suits you better.

Is M&amp,P 2.0 reliable?

I don’t have specific information on “M&P 2.0” as it does not appear to be a widely recognized product or service in my training data. If “M&P 2.0” refers to a particular software, product, or concept, I recommend checking reviews, official documentation, or user testimonials to evaluate its reliability.

What does M&amp,P stand for?

M&P typically stands for “Management and Professional.” However, due to formatting issues, it seems to be displaying incorrectly. If you intended to type “M&P,” it could stand for “Management and Professional,” commonly used in human resources or organizational contexts.

Is the M&amp,P 2.0 single or double action?

The M&P 2.0 (Smith & Wesson M&P M2.0) is a striker-fired, semi-automatic pistol. It operates with a striker-fired action, which is generally considered similar to double-action only (DAO) because there is no external hammer and the trigger pull both completes the cocking and releases the striker. However, it does not have the traditional double-action/single-action (DA/SA) mechanism.

What ammo does a M&amp,P 2.0 use?

The M&P 2.0 is typically designed to use 9mm ammunition, though some models may also be chambered in other calibers such as .40 S&W or .45 ACP. It’s important to check the specific model you have to ensure the correct ammo is used.

What does MP stand for Smith Wesson?

In Smith & Wesson, “M&P” stands for “Military & Police.”

Is the M&amp,P 2.0 a full-size pistol?

The M&P 2.0 is available in full-size, compact, and subcompact models. If you’re referring to the full-size version of the M&P 2.0, then yes, it is a full-size pistol.

What is the civilian version of the MP9?

The civilian version of the MP9 is the B&T TP9.

Why didn’t the military choose Glock?

The military’s decision not to choose Glock as a standard service pistol can be attributed to several factors. These might include:

1. **Contract Requirements**: Military contracts have specific requirements and testing procedures. Glock might not have met some of these specific standards or operational requirements outlined in the contracts, such as modularity, ergonomics, or safety features.

2. **Competition**: During selection processes, Glock faced competition from other manufacturers that might have offered better terms, pricing, or met the specific needs more precisely. For instance, the U.S. Army’s Modular Handgun System competition saw Sig Sauer’s P320 being selected over Glock’s offerings.

3. **Existing Relationships**: The military might have existing contracts or relationships with other manufacturers or find their logistical systems more compatible with other brands.

4. **Cost**: Pricing and overall life cycle costs play a significant role in such decisions. The total cost of acquisition, maintenance, and long-term use might have been more favorable with another brand.

5. **Preferences and Feedback**: Feedback from military personnel regarding ease of use, reliability, and satisfaction might favor another brand over Glock.

These are general considerations, and specific decisions vary based on military requirements and evaluations at the time of the selection process.

What Glock is comparable to the M&amp,P Shield?

The Glock that is comparable to the M&P Shield is the Glock 43. Both are compact, single-stack, 9mm pistols designed for concealed carry.

What is the difference between M&amp,P 2.0 and shield?

M&P 2.0 and Shield are both product lines from Smith & Wesson, a well-known manufacturer of firearms. Here’s a summary of the differences:

1. **Size and Design:**
– **M&P 2.0**: Part of the Military and Police line, typically larger and available in full-size, compact, and subcompact models. Designed for a range of uses, including law enforcement and personal defense.
– **Shield**: A more compact and slimmer version, primarily designed for concealed carry. It’s easier to carry due to its smaller frame.

2. **Purpose and Use:**
– **M&P 2.0**: Versatile with uses in law enforcement, home defense, and competitive shooting. The full-size models offer a wider range of options for duty use.
– **Shield**: Specifically targeted for concealed carry. Its slim profile makes it ideal for this purpose.

3. **Capacity:**
– **M&P 2.0**: Generally higher magazine capacity due to its larger size, especially in full-size models.
– **Shield**: Lower magazine capacity, reflecting its compact nature, but typically sufficient for self-defense scenarios.

4. **Customizability and Features:**
– **M&P 2.0**: Often offers more features like interchangeable backstraps for grip customization, as well as slide serrations and accessory rails for attachments.
– **Shield**: More limited in customizability but offers the essential features for personal defense in a streamlined design.

5. **Recoil Management:**
– **M&P 2.0**: Its larger size and weight can contribute to better recoil management, making it easier to handle for follow-up shots.
– **Shield**: While manageable, the smaller size can result in more perceived recoil.

In summary, the main differences lie in their size, intended use, and specific features designed to meet different needs in personal defense and professional use.