Smith and Wesson M&P9 M2.0 OR Compact 9mm 4″ Barrel 15-Rounds w/ Tennessee Logo Engraved Barrel For Sale

Is the M&amp,P 9 2.0 a good gun?

The Smith & Wesson M&P 9 2.0 is generally considered a good firearm by many users and experts. It is praised for its reliability, ergonomic design, and accuracy. The M&P 9 2.0 features an improved trigger, a durable build, and adaptable grip sizes, making it suitable for a variety of users. It’s popular for both personal defense and law enforcement use. However, whether it’s a “good” gun can be subjective and depends on personal preferences, intended use, and comfort with the handling of the firearm. It’s always recommended to try the firearm yourself, if possible, to ensure it meets your needs and preferences.

Why M&amp,P 2.0 is better than Glock?

The main reasons someone might argue that the M&P 2.0 is better than a Glock depend on personal preferences and specific features:

1. **Ergonomics**: The M&P 2.0 is often praised for having a more ergonomic grip with aggressive texturing, which can provide a more comfortable and secure hold compared to the Glock, depending on the shooter’s hand size and preferences.

2. **Trigger**: Many users find the M&P 2.0 trigger to be an improvement over earlier models and, in some cases, prefer it over the Glock’s stock trigger in terms of break and reset.

3. **Aesthetic Design**: Some shooters prefer the aesthetics of the M&P 2.0, which often has a more traditional appearance compared to the Glock’s more utilitarian design.

4. **Sight Options**: The M&P 2.0 line often comes with several sight configurations and upgrades that might appeal to certain users over Glock’s factory sights.

5. **Customizability**: While both brands offer customization options, the M&P 2.0 often includes interchangeable backstraps that allow for a more customized grip fit right out of the box.

However, it’s important to note that the choice between an M&P 2.0 and a Glock is subjective and highly dependent on the individual shooter’s needs, intended use, and personal preferences. Each firearm has its own strengths, and what works best for one person might not be the same for another.

Is the M&amp,P Shield 2.0 a good gun?

The Smith & Wesson M&P Shield 2.0 is generally considered a good handgun for many users, particularly for concealed carry and personal defense. Here are some points that are often highlighted:

1. **Ergonomics and Design**: The M&P Shield 2.0 features an ergonomic design that fits well in most hands. It has a slim profile, making it easy to conceal.

2. **Reliability**: It is known for its reliability and performance, with consistent positive reviews regarding its accuracy and handling.

3. **Trigger Improvement**: The 2.0 version features an improved trigger compared to its predecessor, with a lighter pull and a more tactile reset, which is often appreciated by users.

4. **Durability**: The gun is made with durable materials and has a corrosion-resistant finish, which adds to its longevity.

5. **Affordability**: It is priced competitively, offering good value for the features and quality it provides.

6. **Customization**: There is a range of aftermarket options available for further customization, including sights and grips.

Ultimately, whether it’s a good gun for you will depend on your specific needs, preferences, and how it feels in your hand during operation. It’s always helpful to try it out first, if possible, to see if it meets your expectations.

Is M&amp,P 2.0 good for concealed carry?

The M&P (Military and Police) 2.0 series by Smith & Wesson is generally well-regarded for concealed carry. Models within this series are designed for reliability, durability, and ease of use, which are important factors for concealed carry. Here are some considerations:

1. **Size and Weight**: The M&P 2.0 series comes in various sizes, including compact versions that are suitable for concealed carry.

2. **Comfort**: The ergonomic design and customizable grip options enhance comfort, which is important for carrying a firearm for extended periods.

3. **Performance**: The series is known for its accuracy and reliability, which are crucial for self-defense scenarios.

4. **Capacity**: Depending on the specific model, the 2.0 series offers decent magazine capacity for a concealed carry firearm.

Overall, whether the M&P 2.0 is good for concealed carry depends on personal preferences such as size, grip feel, and capacity needs. It is recommended to try handling the firearm and, if possible, test firing it to ensure it meets your comfort and usability requirements.

Is the M&amp,P 2.0 discontinued?

Yes, the Smith & Wesson M&P 2.0 is still in production and has not been discontinued.

Which is better, Glock or S&amp,W?

Determining whether Glock or Smith & Wesson (S&W) is better depends on various factors, including personal preferences, intended use, and specific models being compared.

– **Glock**: Known for their reliability, simplicity, and ease of use, Glocks are popular among law enforcement and civilian users worldwide. They have a reputation for being rugged and easy to maintain, with a consistent trigger pull and a large aftermarket for customization.

– **Smith & Wesson**: S&W offers a wide range of firearms, including revolvers and semi-automatic pistols. They are known for their quality craftsmanship and innovative designs. S&W firearms often appeal to those who appreciate traditional styling and features.

When comparing, consider factors such as ergonomics, weight, capacity, ease of use, and specific features of each model. Ultimately, the better choice depends on the individual’s needs and preferences, so it might be helpful to handle and test-fire models from both manufacturers to make an informed decision.

How many rounds can a M&amp,P 2.0 hold?

The M&P 2.0, manufactured by Smith & Wesson, is available in several configurations, which influence its magazine capacity. The standard 9mm variant typically has a capacity of 15 to 17 rounds, while the .40 S&W version generally holds around 13 to 15 rounds. Variants in other calibers or with different magazine options may have varying capacities, but these are the most common configurations.

Why didn’t the military choose Glock?

The military’s decision to not choose Glock for standard service pistols can be influenced by various factors, including but not limited to:

1. **Requirements and Specifications:** The military sets specific requirements for their firearms, including reliability, durability, shooting accuracy, and adaptability. It’s possible that Glock did not fully meet all the particular specifications or performance metrics desired by the military at the time of selection.

2. **Cost and Logistics:** The overall cost of acquisition, including unit price, spare parts, and maintenance expenses, as well as the logistical aspects such as existing supply chains and compatibility with current equipment, can play a significant role in the decision-making process.

3. **Competition:** During procurement processes, multiple manufacturers usually submit bids. Another company may have offered a firearm that better met the military’s criteria or offered better terms.

4. **Testing and Evaluation Results:** During testing phases, the military evaluates various contenders for performance in different conditions. If Glock pistols did not perform as well as competitors in military tests or evaluations, they might not have been selected.

5. **Political or Contractual Considerations:** Sometimes, decisions can be influenced by political factors, existing contracts, or partnerships with other manufacturers.

6. **User Feedback and Historical Performance:** Feedback from military personnel or historical performance records (including past issues or successes with Glock or other firearms) can influence decisions.

Each of these factors can vary based on the specific needs and contexts of different military forces at the time of decision-making.

What ammo does a M&amp,P 2.0 use?

The M&P 2.0, a popular pistol manufactured by Smith & Wesson, typically uses a specific type of ammunition based on its model variant. Common chamberings for the M&P 2.0 include 9mm Luger, .40 S&W, and .45 ACP. To determine the correct ammo for a specific M&P 2.0 model, you should check the markings on the barrel or consult the firearm’s user manual.

Are Smith and Wesson M&amp,P reliable?

Smith & Wesson M&P firearms are generally considered reliable by many users and firearms experts. They are popular among both law enforcement and civilian users for self-defense, target shooting, and competition. The M&P series is known for its ergonomic design, durability, and consistent performance. However, like any firearm, reliability can depend on factors such as maintenance, ammunition quality, and individual use. It’s always recommended to test any firearm personally to ensure it meets your specific needs and expectations.

Is the Smith and Wesson SD9 2.0 a good gun?

The Smith & Wesson SD9 2.0 is generally considered a reliable and budget-friendly handgun. It is praised for its ergonomics, ease of use, and self-defense capabilities. However, some users have noted concerns about the trigger feel and reset. Whether it is a “good” gun depends on individual preferences and needs, so it’s important to handle and test one personally if possible to determine if it suits your requirements.

What year did the M&amp,P 2.0 come out?

The M&P 2.0, which is a series of firearms by Smith & Wesson, was released in 2017.

Is the M&amp,P 2.0 a full size pistol?

The M&P 2.0 is a series of pistols produced by Smith & Wesson, and it includes full-size models, as well as compact and subcompact models. Therefore, some variants of the M&P 2.0 are full-size pistols.