Smith and Wesson LE M&P9 M2.0 9mm 4.2″ Barrel No Mag – USED For Sale

Why M&amp,P 2.0 is better than Glock?

Determining whether the M&P 2.0 is better than a Glock depends on various criteria such as personal preference, intended use, and specific features. Here are some reasons why someone might prefer the M&P 2.0 over a Glock:

1. **Ergonomics**: The M&P 2.0 is often praised for its ergonomic design, including interchangeable backstraps to fit different hand sizes, which some users find more comfortable than Glock’s grip.

2. **Grip Texture**: The aggressive grip texture on the M&P 2.0 provides a secure hold, which can be particularly beneficial in adverse conditions or when shooting with sweaty hands.

3. **Trigger**: Some users prefer the M&P 2.0’s trigger feel and reset over that of a standard Glock, although this is subjective and can vary between individuals.

4. **Aesthetics and Design**: The M&P 2.0 may appeal to those who prefer its aesthetics and linear design, with some considering it a more visually appealing option compared to Glock’s utilitarian look.

5. **Sight Options**: The M&P 2.0 often comes with good sight options out of the box, and for some models, the ability to mount optics more easily.

6. **Customization**: While both brands offer customization options, users looking for specific Smith & Wesson aftermarket parts or modifications might lean towards the M&P 2.0.

Ultimately, the choice between an M&P 2.0 and a Glock will depend on the user’s personal preference, intended use (such as everyday carry, home defense, or competitive shooting), and the specific features they value most in a handgun. Ideally, trying both models in person would be the best way to determine which is better for an individual’s needs.

Is the M&amp,P 2.0 discontinued?

Yes, the M&P 2.0 is not discontinued. Smith & Wesson continues to manufacture and sell the M&P 2.0 series as of the latest available information.

Is the MP9 a good gun?

The MP9 is generally considered a good submachine gun, especially for specific roles and environments. Here are a few points to consider:

1. **Compact and Lightweight**: The MP9 is known for its compact size and light weight, making it easy to handle and maneuver, especially in close quarters.

2. **Rate of Fire**: It has a high rate of fire, which can be advantageous in close-range combat situations, providing significant firepower.

3. **Versatility**: The MP9 is often praised for its versatility, with features that allow for various attachments like suppressors and optics, which can be beneficial for different tactical requirements.

4. **Recoil Management**: Its design includes features that help manage recoil, making it easier to maintain accuracy during rapid firing.

5. **Uses**: It is commonly used by law enforcement and military units around the world, indicating a level of trust in its capabilities.

Overall, the MP9 is well-regarded for its intended use cases, but like any firearm, its “goodness” can depend on the specific needs and preferences of the user.

How many rounds can a M&amp,P 2.0 hold?

The Smith & Wesson M&P 2.0 pistol has various models with different magazine capacities. The standard 9mm and .40 S&W models typically hold up to 15 or 17 rounds, while the .45 ACP model holds up to 10 or 14 rounds, depending on the magazine. Always check the specific model for exact capacity.

Which is more reliable, Glock or Smith and Wesson?

Determining which brand is more reliable, Glock or Smith & Wesson, often depends on personal preferences and usage. Both companies have strong reputations for producing reliable firearms.

– **Glock**: Known for their reliability, simplicity, and ease of maintenance. Glock pistols are popular among law enforcement and civilian shooters for their consistent performance.

– **Smith & Wesson**: Offers a wide range of firearms, including revolvers and semi-automatic pistols, which are praised for their quality and craftsmanship. They have a long history and are trusted by many shooters.

Ultimately, the choice between Glock and Smith & Wesson may come down to personal preference, including factors like ergonomics, intended use, and experience. Testing both types of firearms personally, if possible, can help make a more informed decision based on individual comfort and shooting style.

Is M&amp,P 2.0 reliable?

I don’t have specific information on M&P 2.0’s reliability due to the ambiguity of “M&P 2.0.” It could refer to a product, service, software, or model that I’m not aware of, given the lack of context and specific details. To determine its reliability, consider researching recent user reviews, expert opinions, or testing data related to this specific version.

What does M&amp,P stand for?

“M&P” typically stands for “Manufacturing and Production.” However, the meaning can vary based on context, so it would be helpful to know the specific field or area where you came across this abbreviation.

Is the M&amp,P 2.0 single or double action?

The M&P 2.0 is a striker-fired pistol, which is generally considered a type of double-action-only mechanism as there is no external hammer, and each trigger pull performs both the cocking and firing action.

What ammo does a M&amp,P 2.0 use?

The M&P 2.0 typically uses 9mm ammunition, although it is also available in other calibers such as .40 S&W and .45 ACP. It’s important to verify the specific model to ensure you are using the correct ammunition.

Why didn’t the military choose Glock?

The U.S. military did not choose Glock for its Modular Handgun System program, opting instead for the SIG Sauer P320 (designated the M17 and M18) as their standard service pistol in 2017. The decision was likely based on several factors:

1. **Modularity**: The SIG Sauer P320 offered greater modularity, allowing for the interchangeability of parts and customization to meet various mission requirements. This was a key consideration in the Modular Handgun System program.

2. **Competitive Contract Bid**: SIG Sauer provided a competitive bid, offering favorable terms and pricing that aligned with the military’s budget and requirements. Cost-effectiveness is a major factor in military procurement processes.

3. **Testing and Evaluation**: The P320 met or exceeded the specific requirements and testing criteria set by the military, including reliability, durability, and performance in various conditions.

4. **Safety Features**: The P320 has a unique design with a striker-fired system that includes an internal safety feature, which may have been a contributing factor in its selection.

Each of these factors reportedly played a role in the military’s decision-making process.

What Glock is comparable to the M&amp,P Shield?

The Glock 43 is often considered comparable to the Smith & Wesson M&P Shield. Both are compact, single-stack 9mm pistols designed for concealed carry.

What is the difference between M&amp,P 2.0 and shield?

M&P 2.0 and the M&P Shield are both product lines from Smith & Wesson, but they cater to slightly different market segments and uses.

1. **M&P 2.0**:
– **Design Purpose**: It is designed as a full-sized, duty pistol. It is suitable for law enforcement, home defense, and target shooting.
– **Variants**: The M&P 2.0 line includes full-sized and compact models, accommodating a variety of calibers including 9mm, .40 S&W, and .45 ACP.
– **Features**: It typically includes a more aggressive grip texture, an improved trigger system, and steel-reinforced polymer frames for enhanced durability.
– **Capacity**: Generally, models have a higher magazine capacity compared to the Shield.

2. **M&P Shield**:
– **Design Purpose**: The Shield is designed for concealed carry. It is compact and lighter, making it easier to conceal on the body.
– **Variants**: It primarily comes in subcompact models and is available in calibers like 9mm, .40 S&W, and .45 ACP.
– **Features**: The Shield emphasizes a slimmer profile for comfortable all-day carry, with a lower magazine capacity due to its smaller size.
– **Capacity**: The magazine capacity tends to be lower, typically ranging from 6 to 8 rounds, depending on the caliber and model.

In summary, the M&P 2.0 suits users looking for a more substantial firearm for broader applications such as home defense or duty use, while the M&P Shield is ideal for those prioritizing ease of carry and concealment.

Why did the FBI choose Glock?

The FBI chose Glock pistols primarily due to their reliability, durability, and performance. Several factors contributed to this decision:

1. **Performance**: Glock pistols are known for their consistent performance and accuracy. This is crucial for law enforcement agencies that require dependable firearms.

2. **Durability**: Glock’s design incorporates a polymer frame, which makes it lighter and less prone to corrosion compared to traditional all-metal pistols. The simplicity and resilience of the pistols allow them to function well under adverse conditions.

3. **Safety Features**: Glocks incorporate multiple safety features, including a trigger safety and a drop safety, which help prevent accidental discharge.

4. **Capacity**: Glock pistols typically have a higher magazine capacity compared to other similar-sized handguns. This provides law enforcement officers with more rounds without needing to reload.

5. **Ease of Maintenance**: Glocks have a simple design with fewer parts, making them easier to disassemble and clean, which is a significant advantage for law enforcement agencies.

6. **Cost-Effectiveness**: The purchase and maintenance of Glock pistols are cost-effective, which is an essential consideration for government agencies.

These attributes made Glock a preferred choice for the FBI and many other law enforcement agencies worldwide.