Smith and Wesson M&P M2.0 Flat Dark Earth .45 ACP 4.6″ Barrel 10-Rounds For Sale

Why M&amp,P 2.0 is better than Glock?

The M&P 2.0 and Glock are both popular firearms choices, and opinions on which is better can vary based on personal preference and specific needs. Here are some reasons why some users might prefer the M&P 2.0 over a Glock:

1. **Ergonomics**: The M&P 2.0 is often praised for its ergonomic design, which includes an aggressive grip texture and four interchangeable palm swell grip inserts for a customizable fit. This can provide a more comfortable and secure grip compared to some Glock models.

2. **Trigger**: Some users find the trigger on the M&P 2.0 to be smoother and more consistent than the stock trigger on a Glock. The M&P 2.0 is often noted for having a crisp break and an audible reset.

3. **Aesthetics**: The design and aesthetics of the M&P 2.0 might be more appealing to some users who prefer the look and finish of the M&P line over Glock’s more utilitarian appearance.

4. **Availability of Models and Customization**: The M&P 2.0 offers a range of models with different features, including options with manual safeties, longer barrels, or even optic-ready slides. While Glocks are highly customizable, some users appreciate the out-of-the-box features and options available with the M&P 2.0.

5. **Build Materials and Finish**: The M&P 2.0 uses a stainless steel chassis and has a different finish that some users believe provides better resistance to corrosion and wear compared to Glock’s finish.

It’s important to note that Glock firearms are also highly regarded for their reliability, simplicity, and widespread use among law enforcement and military units. Ultimately, the decision between the M&P 2.0 and a Glock depends on individual preferences, intended use, and specific features that are prioritized by the shooter.

Is the M&amp,P 2.0 discontinued?

As of my last update, the Smith & Wesson M&P 2.0 line was not officially discontinued. However, for the most up-to-date information, you should check directly with Smith & Wesson or authorized dealers, as they would have the latest updates regarding product availability.

What is the difference between M&amp,P Shield 2.0 and Plus?

The primary differences between the M&P Shield 2.0 and the M&P Shield Plus are in capacity, trigger mechanism, and ergonomic enhancements:

1. **Magazine Capacity**:
– **M&P Shield 2.0**: This model typically comes with a standard magazine capacity of 7+1 or 8+1 rounds, depending on whether the flush-fit or extended magazine is used.
– **M&P Shield Plus**: The Plus model features a higher magazine capacity, offering up to 10+1 rounds with the flush-fit magazine and up to 13+1 rounds with the extended magazine.

2. **Trigger**:
– **M&P Shield 2.0**: While it does have a refined trigger compared to the original Shield, the 2.0 model’s trigger pull is a bit heavier.
– **M&P Shield Plus**: This model features an improved, crisper, and lighter trigger designed for a smoother shooting experience.

3. **Grip Texture**:
– **Both Models**: The Shield 2.0 introduced a more aggressive grip texture compared to the original Shield. The Shield Plus maintains a similar grip texture, providing a secure hold.

4. **Overall Ergonomics**:
– The Shield Plus builds on the ergonomic improvements of the 2.0 version, offering a slightly enhanced design for better handling and comfort.

These enhancements make the M&P Shield Plus a more modern option, particularly for users interested in a higher capacity magazine and a refined trigger pull.

Is the M&amp,P 2.0 compact good for concealed carry?

The Smith & Wesson M&P 2.0 Compact is generally considered a good option for concealed carry. It is designed to be a versatile firearm, balancing size, weight, and capacity, making it suitable for everyday carry. Key attributes include its ergonomic grip, improved trigger system, and overall reliability. Nonetheless, when choosing a concealed carry firearm, it’s essential to consider personal preferences regarding size, comfort, and handling, as well as compliance with local laws and regulations.

Which is more reliable, Glock or Smith and Wesson?

Both Glock and Smith & Wesson are reputable manufacturers with long histories of producing reliable firearms. The choice between them often comes down to personal preference, specific model comparisons, and intended use.

– **Glock**: Known for its polymer-framed pistols, Glock models are praised for their simplicity, reliability, and ease of maintenance. They have a robust design and are widely used by law enforcement and military organizations worldwide.

– **Smith & Wesson**: They offer a wide range of firearms, including the highly popular M&P (Military and Police) series. Smith & Wesson is renowned for its craftsmanship and innovation, producing reliable and durable firearms.

Ultimately, the reliability of a firearm can depend more on how well it is maintained and the specific model rather than the brand alone. A hands-on experience, such as trying out models from both manufacturers at a range, might help in making a more informed decision.

How many rounds can a M&amp,P 2.0 hold?

The Smith & Wesson M&P (Military and Police) 2.0 series includes various models with differing capacities. For example, the M&P 2.0 Full Size 9mm typically comes with 17-round magazines, while the Compact model might have around a 15-round capacity, and subcompact versions could have even fewer. Specific magazine capacities can vary based on state laws and model configurations.

What does M&amp,P stand for?

The term “M&P” typically stands for “Methods and Procedures.” It’s often used in corporate and business environments to refer to the standardized processes and guidelines that outline how tasks and operations should be performed.

Is M&amp,P 2.0 reliable?

M&P 2.0’s reliability would depend on various factors, such as its intended use, reviews from users, expert analysis, and comparisons to previous versions or similar products. Without specific context or data on M&P 2.0, I cannot definitively answer whether it is reliable. It’s best to look for user reviews, expert opinions, and any available performance data to assess its reliability.

What ammo does a M&amp,P 2.0 use?

The M&P 2.0 typically uses 9mm, .40 S&W, or .45 ACP ammunition, depending on the specific model. Always check the firearm’s specifications or markings for the correct type of ammunition.

Is the M&amp,P 2.0 single or double stack?

The M&P 2.0 (Military & Police) series by Smith & Wesson typically features a double stack magazine.

What year did the M&amp,P Shield 2.0 come out?

The M&P Shield 2.0 was released in 2017.

Does the M&amp,P Shield 2.0 have a safety?

Yes, the M&P Shield 2.0 is available in models that include a manual safety, as well as models without a manual safety. It depends on the specific version you choose.

Is M&amp,P 2.0 reliable?

I’m sorry, but I don’t have specific information regarding “M&P 2.0” to assess its reliability. If you can provide more context or details about what “M&P 2.0” refers to, I may be able to help further. It’s also a good idea to check reviews, expert opinions, and user feedback to gauge the reliability of any product or service.

Why didn’t the military choose Glock?

The military’s choice not to adopt Glock pistols can be influenced by various factors, including:

1. **Performance Requirements**: Military testing processes are rigorous, and Glock pistols may not have met specific performance criteria for reliability, accuracy, or durability under certain conditions compared to other models.

2. **Customization and Modularity**: The military often requires customizable and modular weapons to fit different roles and preferences. Other pistols might offer better adaptability to various missions and environments.

3. **Contract Specifications**: The procurement process involves detailed specifications and requirements. Another manufacturer might have submitted a proposal that better aligned with these requirements or offered better cost-effectiveness.

4. **Testing and Evaluation Results**: Extensive field and range testing results play a critical role. The military might have found another pistol to perform better during these trials.

5. **Political and Economic Factors**: Decisions can be influenced by political considerations or the desire to support domestic manufacturers.

6. **Existing Relationships and Logistics**: The military might already have established logistics and training around a particular platform, making it simpler and more cost-effective to continue with that over switching to Glock.

Without specific context on a particular decision or contract, these general reasons could explain why Glock was not chosen.

What Glock is comparable to the M&amp,P Shield?

The Glock model that is often considered comparable to the Smith & Wesson M&P Shield is the Glock 43. Both are popular choices for concealed carry, featuring compact designs and chambered in 9mm.