Smith and Wesson M&P40 M2.0 .40 SW 4.25″ Barrel 10-Rounds For Sale

Why M&amp,P 2.0 is better than Glock?

The M&P 2.0 and Glock pistols each have their own set of strengths, and which is considered better can depend on personal preferences, intended use, and specific features valued by the user. However, some reasons why someone might prefer the M&P 2.0 over a Glock could include:

1. **Ergonomics**: The M&P 2.0 is praised for its comfortable grip and ergonomic design, which includes an aggressive texture and interchangeable backstraps for a customizable fit.

2. **Trigger**: Some users find the trigger on the M&P 2.0 to be smoother and more refined compared to the stock trigger on many Glock models.

3. **Aesthetic and Design**: The M&P 2.0 may have an aesthetic appeal and design that resonates more with some users, including its slide serrations and overall design.

4. **Material and Finish**: The M&P 2.0 often comes with a durable Armornite finish that helps resist corrosion and wear.

5. **Recoil Management**: Some shooters find the recoil management of the M&P 2.0 to be excellent, allowing for faster follow-up shots.

Ultimately, the choice between the M&P 2.0 and a Glock will come down to individual preference, shooting style, and specific needs. Many users might prefer the M&P 2.0 for the reasons above, while others might favor Glocks for their simplicity, historical reputation, and extensive aftermarket support.

Is the M&amp,P 2.0 discontinued?

As of my last update, the Smith & Wesson M&P 2.0 series has not been officially discontinued. However, for the most accurate and up-to-date information, it’s best to check with Smith & Wesson’s announcements or authorized dealers.

Is the M&amp,P 40 a good gun?

The M&P 40 is generally considered a good firearm by many users for several reasons:

1. **Reliability**: It has a reputation for being reliable, with fewer jams or malfunctions compared to some other models.

2. **Ergonomics**: The M&P line is often praised for its comfortable grip and ease of handling, which can be adjusted with interchangeable backstraps.

3. **Caliber**: Chambered in .40 S&W, it offers a balance between stopping power and magazine capacity.

4. **Build Quality**: Known for durable construction and high-quality materials.

5. **Aftermarket Support**: There are many aftermarket accessories available for customization and improvement.

However, whether it’s a “good gun” can be subjective and depends on individual preferences such as intended use (self-defense, range shooting, etc.), comfort, and budget. It’s always recommended to try handling or shooting a firearm before purchasing if possible.

What do M and P stand for?

M and P can stand for various things depending on the context. Without additional information, here are a few possible meanings:

– In academic degrees: M could stand for Master (e.g., MA – Master of Arts), and P could stand for Philosophy (e.g., PhD – Doctor of Philosophy).
– In business: M could mean Marketing, and P could mean Product.
– In science: M might represent Molarity, and P could represent Pressure.
– In music: M can stand for Minor, and P for Piano.
– In engineering/economics: M often denotes Mass, while P often denotes Power or Profit.

Please provide more context for a specific answer.

Which is more reliable, Glock or Smith and Wesson?

Both Glock and Smith & Wesson are reputable manufacturers known for producing reliable firearms, but their reliability can depend on specific models and user preferences. Generally, Glocks are often praised for their simplicity, durability, and ease of maintenance. Smith & Wesson offers a broad range of firearms with solid reputations, particularly their M&P series which is well-regarded.

Ultimately, the choice between Glock and Smith & Wesson may come down to personal preference, specific model comparisons, and the intended use of the firearm. It’s recommended to read reviews, test guns personally, and consider features important to you when determining reliability for your needs.

Is M&amp,P 2.0 reliable?

To evaluate the reliability of M&P 2.0, consider the following factors:

1. **User Reviews and Feedback:** Look for reviews and testimonials from users who have experience with M&P 2.0. Consistent positive feedback can indicate reliability.

2. **Performance Metrics:** Analyze any available performance data or case studies regarding M&P 2.0. Reliable systems typically have consistent and predictable outputs.

3. **Expert Opinions:** Seek out evaluations or appraisals from experts in the field. Experts can provide insights into the reliability based on technical aspects.

4. **Updates and Support:** Consider the history of updates and the level of customer support available. Frequent updates and responsive support usually suggest a commitment to maintaining reliability.

5. **Testing and Certification:** Check if M&P 2.0 has undergone any formal testing or certification processes. Certifications from reputable organizations can be a strong indicator of reliability.

Without specific details or data on M&P 2.0, this is a general approach to assessing its reliability.

Is the M&amp,P 2.0 single or double action?

The M&P 2.0 (Military and Police) series is a striker-fired pistol, which means it operates using a single-action mechanism. Unlike traditional double-action pistols, striker-fired pistols do not have an external hammer; instead, the striker is partially cocked by the action of cycling the slide, and the firing pin is fully cocked and released by the pull of the trigger.

What ammo does a M&amp,P 2.0 use?

The Smith & Wesson M&P 2.0 is available in several calibers, including 9mm, .40 S&W, and .45 ACP. The specific ammunition you would use depends on which model you have. Make sure to check your firearm’s specifications to determine the correct caliber.

Where are M&amp,P pistols made?

M&P pistols, made by Smith & Wesson, are manufactured in the United States. The company’s primary manufacturing facility is located in Springfield, Massachusetts.

Does 40 S&amp,W hit harder than 9mm?

The .40 S&W generally hits harder than the 9mm because it typically has a larger bullet and more energy. The .40 S&W is designed to provide a balance between the high capacity of the 9mm and the stopping power of larger calibers. However, “hitting harder” can depend on various factors, including bullet design, barrel length, and specific loadings or manufacturer specifications. While the .40 S&W does typically offer more energy and greater stopping power, the 9mm is often chosen for its lower recoil and higher magazine capacity. Ultimately, the choice between the two calibers depends on personal preference, intended use, and specific firearm characteristics.

Does the FBI still use 40 S&amp,W?

Yes, the FBI still uses the .40 S&W caliber, although its primary choice has shifted back to 9mm in recent years. However, the agency still maintains some inventory of .40 S&W firearms for specific situations or preferences.

What is the best bullets for 40 S&amp,W?

The best bullets for a .40 S&W can depend on the intended use, such as self-defense, target shooting, or hunting. For self-defense, popular choices include:

1. **Federal HST** – Known for its consistent expansion and penetration.
2. **Speer Gold Dot** – Offers reliable expansion and is used by many law enforcement agencies.
3. **Hornady Critical Duty/Critical Defense** – Designed to perform well through barriers.

For target shooting or practice, full metal jacket (FMJ) rounds from brands like Winchester, Remington, or Blazer are often used due to their affordability and reliability.

For hunting, make sure to choose a bullet that ensures good expansion and penetration, suitable for the game you are pursuing; options like the Hornady XTP can be a good choice.

Always ensure any ammunition you choose functions reliably in your firearm.

Why didn’t the military choose Glock?

The military’s decision not to choose Glock can be attributed to a variety of factors, which may include specific requirements, preferences, or testing results. Here are some general reasons that might influence such a decision:

1. **Performance Standards**: The military often has rigorous standards and testing protocols for selecting firearms. Other brands or models might have performed better in terms of accuracy, reliability, and durability under extreme conditions.

2. **Ergonomics and Use**: Certain designs might better suit the needs of military personnel, including ease of use, maintenance, and adaptability to different combat scenarios.

3. **Contractual and Logistical Considerations**: Procurement decisions might involve cost considerations, existing contracts with other manufacturers, and logistical factors like the availability of parts and support.

4. **Compatibility with Existing Systems**: The military might prioritize compatibility with existing equipment and ammunition types.

5. **Customizability**: Other firearms might offer more customization options for various military applications or roles.

6. **Political and Strategic Factors**: Decisions can also be influenced by political or strategic alliances with specific countries or manufacturers.

Ultimately, the specific reasons would depend on the context and criteria set by the military for that particular procurement.

What Glock is comparable to the M&amp,P Shield?

The Glock 43 is comparable to the Smith & Wesson M&P Shield, as both are compact, single-stack 9mm handguns designed for concealed carry.

What is the difference between M&amp,P 2.0 and shield?

M&P 2.0 and Shield are both product lines from Smith & Wesson, primarily focusing on firearms, but they cater to slightly different markets and needs.

1. **M&P 2.0**:
– **Type**: Full-size to compact handguns.
– **Intended Use**: Designed for versatility, the M&P 2.0 is often used by law enforcement and military, as well as civilians for home defense and competitive shooting.
– **Features**: Enhanced ergonomics, a robust stainless steel chassis, aggressive grip texture, and improved trigger systems over previous versions.

2. **Shield**:
– **Type**: Subcompact handguns.
– **Intended Use**: Primarily designed for concealed carry due to its slimmer and more compact design.
– **Features**: Smaller size for easier concealability, usually featuring a single-stack magazine to maintain a slim profile. While it may not have some of the advanced features of the M&P 2.0, it is prized for its reliability and ease of carry.

In summary, the main difference lies in their intended use and size, with the M&P 2.0 being more adaptable for various applications, including duty use, and the Shield being optimized for concealed carry.