Smith and Wesson M&P40 M2.0 .40 SW 4.25″ Barrel 15-Rounds For Sale

Why M&amp,P 2.0 is better than Glock?

Choosing between the M&P 2.0 and a Glock model depends on personal preference and specific needs, as both brands have loyal followings and offer quality firearms. Here are several aspects where some might argue that the M&P 2.0 could be considered better:

1. **Ergonomics**: The M&P 2.0 is often praised for its ergonomics and grip texture, which many find comfortable and secure, especially under various conditions. The interchangeable backstraps also allow for a more customized fit compared to some Glock models.

2. **Trigger**: Some shooters prefer the trigger feel of the M&P 2.0, describing it as having a crisper break and a shorter reset compared to earlier versions and some Glock models.

3. **Aesthetics**: The M&P 2.0 is often considered more visually appealing with its aggressive styling and textured grip. Aesthetics are subjective, but it’s something some users favor.

4. **Build Material**: The M&P 2.0 features a stainless steel chassis system that some believe offers improved durability and reduced flex.

5. **Recoil Management**: Some find the M&P 2.0 to have slightly better recoil management, which could contribute to quicker follow-up shots and overall shooting comfort.

Ultimately, determining which firearm is “better” depends on the shooter’s priorities, whether that’s ergonomics, customization options, or aesthetic preferences. It’s best to try out both models if possible to see which one aligns more closely with your needs.

Is the M&amp,P 2.0 discontinued?

The M&P 2.0 is not discontinued. It is a current line of pistols produced by Smith & Wesson.

Is the M&amp,P 40 a good gun?

The M&P 40 is considered a good firearm by many users, particularly for law enforcement and personal protection. It is manufactured by Smith & Wesson and is known for its reliability, durability, and ergonomic design. The pistol features a polymer frame, interchangeable grips for customizable fit, and a consistent trigger pull, making it a popular choice for those who prefer a .40 S&W caliber handgun. However, whether it is a “good” gun can be subjective and depends on personal preferences, intended use, and individual experiences. It’s always best to handle and, if possible, test the firearm yourself to see if it meets your specific needs and expectations.

What do M and P stand for?

M and P can stand for many things, and their meaning depends on the context in which they are used. Without specific context, here are a few possibilities:

– M: Mass, P: Pressure (in physics)
– M: Married, P: Partner (in relationship context)
– M: Male, P: Primary (in demographic studies)
– M: Money, P: Power (in finance or business context)
– M: Marketing, P: Product (in business or marketing)
– M: Meters, P: Perimeter (in geometry)
– M: Manager, P: Professional (in job titles)

If you can provide more context or specify the field, I can give a more accurate answer.

Which is more reliable, Glock or Smith and Wesson?

Both Glock and Smith & Wesson are highly reputable firearm manufacturers, each known for producing reliable weapons. The reliability of a firearm can depend on specific models, their intended use, maintenance, and user preferences. Glock is often praised for its simplicity, durability, and widespread adoption by law enforcement agencies worldwide. Smith & Wesson is renowned for its quality craftsmanship and has a long history in the firearms industry.

Ultimately, both brands offer reliable options, and the choice may come down to personal preference, specific requirements, or intended use. It’s advisable to consider factors such as ergonomics, intended purpose, and user reviews when determining which might be more reliable for your needs.

Is M&amp,P 2.0 reliable?

I’m unable to provide a specific assessment of the reliability of “M&P 2.0” as there isn’t enough context or data about what “M&P 2.0” refers to. It could be a product, software, service, or something else entirely. For a reliable evaluation, I would need more information on the specific context, user reviews, expert analysis, or technical specifications associated with it.

Is the M&amp,P 2.0 single or double action?

The M&P 2.0 (Military & Police 2.0) is a striker-fired pistol, which means it operates with a single-action mechanism rather than a double-action mechanism.

What ammo does a M&amp,P 2.0 use?

The M&P 2.0 typically uses 9mm ammunition, although it is available in several calibers, including .40 S&W and .45 ACP. The specific caliber would depend on the model you own. Always verify the ammunition caliber that is appropriate for your specific firearm model, as using incorrect ammunition can be dangerous.

Where are M&amp,P pistols made?

M&P pistols, which stand for “Military & Police,” are manufactured by Smith & Wesson. Smith & Wesson is an American company, and its firearms, including M&P pistols, are primarily made in Springfield, Massachusetts, USA.

Does 40 S&amp,W hit harder than 9mm?

The .40 S&W generally has a higher muzzle energy compared to the 9mm, which can translate to hitting harder. The .40 S&W typically uses heavier bullets (usually between 135 to 180 grains) at velocities that can exceed 1,000 feet per second. Meanwhile, the 9mm typically uses lighter bullets (115 to 147 grains) at similar velocities. This higher energy and larger bullet diameter can result in more stopping power for .40 S&W. However, the trade-off is often greater recoil, which can affect accuracy and follow-up shot speed. Ultimately, the choice between the two depends on the shooter’s preferences and intended use.

Does the FBI still use 40 S&amp,W?

Yes, the FBI still uses the .40 S&W (Smith & Wesson) caliber for some of its firearms. However, in recent years, the agency has shifted much of its focus back to 9mm as the primary caliber for its standard-issue pistols due to advancements in ammunition technology and the benefits of higher capacity and lower recoil. Nonetheless, the .40 S&W is still in use within the FBI for certain applications and by some agents who prefer it.

What is the best bullets for 40 S&amp,W?

When selecting the best bullets for a .40 S&W firearm, it’s important to consider factors such as the intended use (e.g., self-defense, target shooting, or hunting), bullet weight, and design. Some popular and widely recommended choices include:

1. **Federal HST**: Known for reliable expansion and penetration, often recommended for self-defense.
2. **Speer Gold Dot**: Another top choice for self-defense, featuring bonded bullets for consistent performance.
3. **Hornady Critical Duty**: Designed for penetration through barriers, suitable for defensive situations.
4. **Winchester PDX1 Defender**: Featuring bonded bullets, offering good expansion and weight retention.
5. **Remington Golden Saber**: Known for its brass jacket and reliable expansion.

For target shooting, using full metal jacket (FMJ) ammunition like Winchester White Box or Federal American Eagle can be cost-effective and reliable.

Ultimately, the “best” bullet can depend on your specific needs and firearm, so it’s advisable to test several types to see which performs best for your intended purpose. Always ensure your selected ammunition is compatible with your firearm.

Why didn’t the military choose Glock?

The U.S. military did not choose Glock for its Modular Handgun System competition to replace the Beretta M9 as its standard sidearm. Instead, they selected the Sig Sauer P320, designated as the M17/M18.

Several factors contributed to this decision:

1. **Modularity**: The Sig Sauer P320 offered a highly modular design that allowed for easy customization, including interchangeable parts to accommodate different hand sizes and operational requirements.

2. **Performance in Trials**: During the rigorous testing and evaluation process, the P320 performed well in various criteria, including accuracy, reliability, and durability.

3. **Compatibility and Flexibility**: The P320 offered features that aligned well with the military’s requirements, such as ambidextrous controls and the ability to change calibers.

4. **Cost Considerations**: Financial factors, including the overall cost of the weapon system and supporting services, may have influenced the final decision.

5. **System Requirements**: The military has specific requirements for its sidearms, and the P320 met these better than Glock’s offerings in this instance.

Overall, while Glock is a popular and reliable firearm choice in many sectors, the Sig Sauer P320 was deemed a better fit for the specific needs of the military at the time of their decision.

What Glock is comparable to the M&amp,P Shield?

The Glock model that is often considered comparable to the Smith & Wesson M&P Shield is the Glock 43. Both are popular choices for concealed carry due to their compact size and reliability.

What is the difference between M&amp,P 2.0 and shield?

M&P 2.0 and Shield refer to different offerings within the Smith & Wesson lineup of firearms. Here are the primary differences:

1. **Design and Purpose**:
– **M&P 2.0**: This is an updated version of the original M&P (Military & Police) series. The M&P 2.0 is designed for a range of applications including law enforcement, military, and civilian use. It comes in several sizes and calibers, making it versatile for different user needs such as duty, carry, and competition.
– **Shield**: The Shield is part of the M&P lineup but is specifically designed as a compact, lightweight, and easy-to-conceal handgun for personal defense. It’s ideal for concealed carry due to its slimmer profile.

2. **Size and Capacity**:
– **M&P 2.0**: Typically larger with a full-size or compact frame, offering higher magazine capacity.
– **Shield**: Smaller, more compact, with a reduced magazine capacity to maintain a slim profile suitable for concealment.

3. **Features**:
– **M&P 2.0**: Often includes features like interchangeable palmswell grips, an extended stainless steel chassis, and an aggressive stippling texture for improved grip.
– **Shield**: Focuses on maintaining a balance between performance and ease of carry, often with a simpler design and fewer customization options.

4. **Intended Use**:
– **M&P 2.0**: Suitable for a variety of roles, including service and home defense, with more options for tactical accessories.
– **Shield**: Primarily intended for personal defense and concealed carry.

By understanding these differences, users can better choose a firearm that meets their specific needs for carry, capacity, and comfort.