Smith and Wesson M&P9 M2.0 9MM 4.25" Barrel 17-Rounds MS For Sale

Why M&amp,P 2.0 is better than Glock?

While both the M&P 2.0 and the Glock are popular firearms, they have distinct features that may appeal to different users depending on their needs and preferences. Here are some points where the M&P 2.0 might be considered better than a Glock, but remember that this is subjective and depends on individual preferences:

1. **Ergonomics and Grip Texture**: The M&P 2.0 is often praised for its aggressive grip texture and improved ergonomics, providing a more secure and comfortable grip for some users compared to Glocks.

2. **Trigger**: The M&P 2.0 has an upgraded trigger system compared to its predecessor, with a crisper break and a more pronounced reset, which some shooters may prefer over the Glock’s stock trigger.

3. **Aesthetic and Design Options**: The M&P 2.0 offers a variety of color and design options, such as FDE (Flat Dark Earth) and various barrel lengths, which might appeal to users looking for a more personalized look.

4. **Ambidextrous Controls**: The M&P 2.0 features ambidextrous controls, including slide stop levers on both sides, which can be advantageous for left-handed users.

5. **Build Material**: Some users appreciate the M&P 2.0’s use of a stainless steel chassis system, which adds strength and rigidity to the frame.

Ultimately, the decision between an M&P 2.0 and a Glock will depend on individual preferences concerning ergonomics, aesthetics, and specific features. It’s essential to handle and, if possible, test-fire both options to determine which one feels better for your needs.

Is the M&amp,P 2.0 discontinued?

Yes, the M&P 2.0 handgun has not been discontinued. The M&P (Military and Police) line, including the 2.0 models, continues to be manufactured and sold by Smith & Wesson.

Is an M&amp,P 2.0 a good gun?

The M&P 2.0 is generally considered a good firearm, particularly for users who are interested in handguns for personal defense, law enforcement, or recreational shooting. The M&P (Military and Police) series by Smith & Wesson is known for its reliability, ergonomic design, and versatility. The 2.0 version includes improvements over the original M&P line, such as an enhanced trigger system, more aggressive grip texture, a reinforced polymer frame, and a stainless steel chassis for added durability and stability.

Ultimately, whether it’s a “good gun” depends on your specific needs and preferences. If you’re considering purchasing one, it’s wise to handle it in person, if possible, and to read reviews or seek opinions from experienced users.

How many rounds can a M&amp,P 2.0 hold?

The M&P 2.0, manufactured by Smith & Wesson, has several variants, each with different magazine capacities. Typically, this firearm can hold:

– 17 rounds for the full-size 9mm variant.
– 15 rounds for the compact 9mm variant.
– 13 rounds for the full-size .40 S&W variant.
– 15 rounds for the .40 S&W compact variant.

These capacities may vary depending on local laws and specific configurations, so it’s always best to check the manufacturer’s specifications for the exact model you are interested in.

Which is more reliable, Glock or Smith and Wesson?

Determining whether Glock or Smith & Wesson is more reliable can depend on several factors, including personal preference, intended use, and specific models. Both brands are well-respected in the firearms community and have loyal followings.

1. **Glock**:
– Known for its simplicity, reliability, and ease of use.
– Often praised for their durability and minimal maintenance requirements.
– Polymer frame, which makes them lightweight.
– Popular among law enforcement and military units worldwide.

2. **Smith & Wesson**:
– Offers a wide range of firearms, including revolvers and semi-automatic pistols.
– Known for quality craftsmanship and historical significance in the firearms industry.
– Popular for their revolvers as well as the M&P (Military & Police) line of semi-automatic pistols.

Ultimately, both brands produce reliable firearms, but personal experience, comfort, and the specific model of firearm can influence which is more reliable for an individual. It’s recommended to test both brands and see which fits better with your needs and preferences.

What ammo does a M&amp,P 2.0 use?

The Smith & Wesson M&P 2.0 is available in several calibers, including 9mm, .40 S&W, and .45 ACP. Therefore, the ammunition you would use depends on the specific model of the M&P 2.0 that you have. Make sure to verify the caliber on your firearm before purchasing ammunition.

What does M&amp,P stand for?

M&P typically stands for Manufacturing and Production.

Is the M&amp,P 2.0 single or double action?

The Smith & Wesson M&P 2.0 is a striker-fired pistol, which means it operates in a manner similar to a double-action mechanism. It is not a traditional single or double action in terms of having a hammer; instead, it’s a consistent trigger pull for each shot.

Does the M&amp,P 2.0 have a trigger safety?

Yes, the Smith & Wesson M&P 2.0 does have a trigger safety.

Is the M&amp,P 2.0 a full-size pistol?

The M&P 2.0 is a series of pistols that come in various sizes, including full-size, compact, and subcompact options. So, the M&P 2.0 does include full-size pistol models as part of its lineup.

What is the effective range of a Smith and Wesson 9mm?

The effective range of a Smith & Wesson 9mm handgun is typically around 50 yards (approximately 46 meters) for accurate shooting. However, practical accuracy and effectiveness in a defensive situation might be expected at shorter distances, usually under 25 yards (about 23 meters).

What is the difference between M&amp,P 2.0 and shield?

M&P (Military and Police) 2.0 and Shield are both product lines from Smith & Wesson, often associated with firearms. Here’s a general comparison between them:

1. **Purpose & Design**:
– **M&P 2.0**: This line is designed for versatility, including use by law enforcement, military, and civilians. It generally features full-size and compact models suitable for various purposes, such as duty use, home defense, and target shooting.
– **Shield**: The Shield series is part of the M&P line but is specifically designed as a concealed carry option. These are typically more compact, lightweight, and slim, making them easier to carry discreetly.

2. **Size & Capacity**:
– **M&P 2.0**: Offers larger frames and higher magazine capacities compared to the Shield. It’s available in various calibers and often comes with full-size models ideal for open carry or duty use.
– **Shield**: Primarily designed for ease of concealment. Typically features a single-stack magazine, resulting in a slimmer profile and slightly reduced capacity compared to the larger M&P variations.

3. **Features**:
– **M&P 2.0**: Known for enhancements like improved triggers, aggressive texturing, and overall greater modularity and customization options.
– **Shield**: While also benefiting from advancements seen in the 2.0 line, it remains focused on concealability and may not include all the enhanced features of larger 2.0 models.

4. **Intended Users**:
– **M&P 2.0**: Geared toward a wider range of users from law enforcement officers and military personnel to civilian shooters who may prefer a full-size or compact firearm.
– **Shield**: Primarily aimed at individuals seeking a reliable and easily concealed option for self-defense.

Overall, the main difference lies in their size, intended use, and the specific needs they serve in terms of firearms ownership and carrying preferences.

Why didn’t the military choose Glock?

The military’s decision not to choose the Glock may be influenced by several factors, depending on the specific context and time, such as:

1. **Specifications and Requirements**: The military may have specific requirements that a Glock model does not fully meet, whether it’s based on caliber, ergonomics, safety features, modularity, or other technical specifications.

2. **Testing and Evaluation**: During testing phases, another firearm might have performed better in terms of reliability, durability, accuracy, or other key performance areas.

3. **Cost and Logistics**: Factors such as acquisition costs, maintenance costs, or the ability to integrate seamlessly with existing logistics systems might influence the decision.

4. **Compatibility**: The need for compatibility with existing equipment, such as holsters or ammunition already in use, may play a role.

5. **Contractual and Political Reasons**: Government contracts can be influenced by political, economic, or strategic reasons, such as supporting domestic manufacturers or broader defense relationships.

6. **User Feedback**: Feedback from military personnel during trials might steer the selection process towards a different firearm.

The choice not to select Glock can vary significantly based on the branch of the military, the specific requirements of a given procurement process, and the competitors in the field at the time of selection.

What Glock is comparable to the M&amp,P Shield?

The Glock that is often compared to the Smith & Wesson M&P Shield is the Glock 43. Both are subcompact, single-stack 9mm pistols known for their concealability, making them popular choices for concealed carry.

What is the difference between M&amp,P 2.0 and shield?

The difference between M&P 2.0 and Shield refers to the variations between two types of Smith & Wesson handguns.

1. **M&P 2.0**:
– This is a full-size or compact handgun, part of the Military & Police lineup, known for its polymer frame and striker-fired mechanism.
– It features an enhanced trigger, improved grip texture, and interchangeable palm swell grips for ergonomic handling.
– M&P 2.0 variants often include options for different calibers, barrel lengths, and configurations.

2. **Shield**:
– The Shield is a more compact, single-stack version designed for concealed carry.
– It is much slimmer and lighter than the standard M&P models, making it easier to carry discreetly.
– The Shield also comes in the M&P 2.0 version with similar upgrades to grip texture and trigger enhancements but maintains its compact dimensions.

In summary, the key difference lies in their size and intended use, with the M&P 2.0 being more versatile and suited for general use or duty carry, while the Shield is tailored for concealed carry with its slim profile.