Smith and Wesson M&P9 M2.0 Black 9mm 4.25" Barrel 17-Rounds No Thumb Safety For Sale

Why M&amp,P 2.0 is better than Glock?

The question of whether the M&P 2.0 is better than the Glock is largely subjective and depends on individual preferences and intended use. However, here are some general points where the M&P 2.0 might be considered better by some users:

1. **Ergonomics**: The M&P 2.0 often receives praise for its ergonomic design, which includes a more contoured grip and interchangeable backstraps, allowing users to customize the grip to their hand size and preference.

2. **Grip Texture**: The M&P 2.0 features an aggressive grip texture, which can enhance control and comfort during shooting, particularly in wet or sweaty conditions.

3. **Trigger**: Some users find the trigger on the M&P 2.0 to have a crisper break and a more tactile reset compared to stock Glock triggers, though this is highly subjective.

4. **Aesthetics**: The aesthetic design of the M&P 2.0, with its more angular and aggressive styling, appeals to some users more than the austere design of Glock pistols.

5. **Slide Serrations**: The M&P 2.0 often features more pronounced slide serrations, which can provide a better grip for racking the slide.

6. **Grip Angle**: Some shooters prefer the grip angle of the M&P 2.0 over the Glock’s, as it can make aiming and point of aim more natural for certain users.

Ultimately, both the M&P 2.0 and Glock are reliable, high-quality firearms. The preference for one over the other will depend on the user’s specific needs, hand fit, and shooting style. It is recommended to handle and test fire both options, if possible, to determine which is better suited to individual preferences.

Is the M&amp,P 2.0 discontinued?

As of my last update, the Smith & Wesson M&P 2.0 has not been discontinued. However, for the most current and accurate information, you should check directly with Smith & Wesson or an authorized dealer.

Is the MP9 a good gun?

The MP9 is generally considered a good firearm for specific purposes. It is a compact submachine gun, known for its lightweight design, high rate of fire, and ease of use, making it suitable for close-quarters combat. It’s often favored by military and law enforcement units for personal defense and operations in confined spaces. However, like any weapon, its suitability depends on the intended use, and preferences can vary among users.

How many rounds can a M&amp,P 2.0 hold?

The Smith & Wesson M&P 2.0, depending on the specific model, generally holds between 10 to 17 rounds in its magazine. Most commonly, full-sized models feature 17-round magazines, while compact models may hold fewer rounds.

Which is more reliable, Glock or Smith and Wesson?

The reliability of firearms can depend on various factors, including the specific model, maintenance, and user familiarity. Both Glock and Smith & Wesson are reputable manufacturers known for producing reliable firearms.

Glock is often praised for its simple design, ease of use, and low maintenance requirements, which contribute to its reputation for reliability, particularly in adverse conditions. Many law enforcement agencies worldwide choose Glock for these reasons.

Smith & Wesson also produces highly reliable firearms, and they are well-regarded for their revolvers and semi-automatic pistols. The choice between the two can often come down to personal preference, specific needs, and intended use.

Ultimately, both brands offer reliable options, and the decision might be influenced more by individual preferences, comfort, and specific use cases. It’s advisable to handle and, if possible, test both to determine which better suits your needs.

Is M&amp,P 2.0 reliable?

I don’t have access to real-time data or updates on specific software or tools beyond October 2023. The reliability of M&P 2.0, or any system, would depend on various factors such as user reviews, expert analysis, software updates, and overall performance metrics. It’s recommended to check recent user feedback, expert reviews, and official documentation or updates from the developers to determine its reliability.

What does M&amp,P stand for?

M&P stands for Methods and Procedures.

Is the M&amp,P 2.0 single or double action?

The M&P 2.0 (Military and Police) is a striker-fired, double-action-only pistol.

What ammo does a M&amp,P 2.0 use?

The M&P 2.0 typically uses 9mm ammunition. However, it’s worth noting that the M&P 2.0 series also offers models that are chambered in other calibers, such as .40 S&W, .45 ACP, and occasionally other variants. It’s important to check the specific model to ensure you’re using the correct ammo.

What does MP stand for Smith Wesson?

MP in Smith & Wesson stands for “Military & Police.”

Is the M&amp,P 2.0 a full-size pistol?

Yes, the M&P 2.0 (Smith & Wesson Military & Police 2.0) is available in a full-size version among other sizes, such as compact and subcompact.

What is the civilian version of the MP9?

The civilian version of the MP9 is the TP9, produced by Brügger & Thomet (B&T). It is designed to comply with civilian firearm regulations, featuring semi-automatic operation and other modifications to differentiate it from the military and law enforcement version.

Why didn’t the military choose Glock?

The military’s decision not to choose Glock firearms can be attributed to several factors, which may include:

1. **Contract Specifications**: The military often has specific requirements for its firearms, including factors like ergonomics, modularity, and compatibility with existing systems. If Glock didn’t meet all these criteria, they might not have been chosen.

2. **Testing and Evaluation**: The military conducts rigorous testing and evaluation of firearms. If Glock did not perform as well as competitors in accuracy, reliability, durability, or other tested areas, it could have influenced the decision.

3. **Cost and Logistics**: Cost considerations, including the pricing of the firearms and their long-term maintenance costs, play a significant role. Logistic considerations like supply chain and existing contracts with other manufacturers might also impact the decision.

4. **Political and Strategic Decisions**: Sometimes decisions are influenced by broader political or strategic relationships with suppliers or countries.

5. **Preference for Modularity**: The military might prefer firearms that offer better modularity or compatibility with different optics, grips, or calibers, which another manufacturer might provide more effectively than Glock.

Ultimately, without specific details about the procurement decision, these are general reasons that might explain why Glock was not chosen by the military.

What Glock is comparable to the M&amp,P Shield?

The Glock that is often compared to the Smith & Wesson M&P Shield is the Glock 43. Both are compact, single-stack 9mm pistols designed for concealed carry, offering similar dimensions and performance.

What is the difference between M&amp,P 2.0 and shield?

M&P 2.0 and Shield are both product lines under the Smith & Wesson brand, primarily known for firearms. The key differences between them relate to their intended use, designs, and specifications:

1. **Design and Purpose**:
– **M&P 2.0**: This is part of the Smith & Wesson Military & Police series, designed for both professionals and civilians. It is versatile and comes in full-size, compact, and subcompact versions, suitable for various applications, including law enforcement, military use, and self-defense.
– **Shield**: The M&P Shield is specifically designed as a concealed carry pistol. It is more compact and lightweight, making it easier to carry discreetly for personal protection.

2. **Size and Weight**:
– **M&P 2.0**: Generally larger and heavier, especially in the full-size versions. This line offers more options for barrel lengths and grip sizes, providing a robust shooting experience.
– **Shield**: Compact and lightweight, focusing on ease of concealment. It’s slimmer and less bulky, suitable for everyday carry.

3. **Capacity**:
– **M&P 2.0**: Typically offers higher magazine capacity due to its larger frame, with options for extended magazines.
– **Shield**: Has a lower magazine capacity compared to the full-size M&P 2.0, aligning with its compact design for concealed carry.

4. **Grip**:
– **M&P 2.0**: Features aggressive grip texturing and interchangeable grip inserts to fit different hand sizes, enhancing control during shooting.
– **Shield**: While it also offers good grip texture, it is designed for quick draws and limited-print profile for concealed carry.

5. **Caliber Options**:
– Both the M&P 2.0 and Shield lines offer models in various calibers including 9mm, .40 S&W, and .45 ACP, although the larger M&P 2.0 may offer even more options.

These differences make the M&P 2.0 and Shield suitable for different users based on their specific needs, whether it’s for professional duty use or personal concealed carry.