Smith and Wesson M&P9 M2.0 Compact FDE 9mm 4" Barrel 15-Rounds For Sale

Why M&amp,P 2.0 is better than Glock?

The comparison between the M&P 2.0 and Glock pistols depends largely on personal preference, intended use, and specific features desired. Here are some reasons why some people might prefer the M&P 2.0 over a Glock:

1. **Ergonomics**: The M&P 2.0 is often praised for its ergonomic grip, which many find more comfortable and natural to hold. It also features multiple interchangeable backstraps to better fit different hand sizes.

2. **Textured Grip**: The M&P 2.0 has a more aggressive grip texture, which can provide a more secure hold, especially in wet or sweaty conditions.

3. **Trigger**: Some users prefer the trigger on the M&P 2.0 for its feel and reset. The 2.0 has an improved trigger over the original M&P, which some find crisper compared to stock Glock triggers.

4. **Aesthetics**: While subjective, some shooters prefer the look and design of the M&P 2.0 over the Glock, appreciating its lines and finish.

5. **Steel Reinforced Frame**: The M&P 2.0 has a steel insert in the frame which adds rigidity and durability, potentially improving longevity.

6. **Price and Value**: Depending on the model and features, the M&P 2.0 can be seen as offering good value for the price point compared to Glock.

7. **Sights**: Out of the box, some versions of the M&P 2.0 offer steel sights, whereas Glock often comes with polymer sights, which some users prefer to replace immediately.

8. **Variety**: The M&P 2.0 series comes in a variety of calibers, sizes, and configurations, allowing for more tailored choices to meet specific needs.

Ultimately, the “better” choice is subjective and based on individual needs, preferences, and experiences. Both the M&P 2.0 and Glock are reliable and trusted firearms with strong reputations.

Is the M&amp,P 2.0 discontinued?

As of my knowledge cutoff in October 2023, the Smith & Wesson M&P 2.0 has not been officially discontinued. However, it’s always a good idea to check with the manufacturer or authorized dealers for the most current information.

What is the difference between M&amp,P Shield 2.0 and M&amp,P 2.0 Compact?

The main differences between the M&P Shield 2.0 and the M&P 2.0 Compact primarily relate to their size, capacity, and intended use:

1. **Size**:
– **M&P Shield 2.0**: This is a single-stack, subcompact pistol designed for concealed carry. Its slender profile makes it easy to carry discreetly.
– **M&P 2.0 Compact**: This is slightly larger than the Shield, offering a double-stack design. It is more compact than full-sized models but larger than the Shield.

2. **Capacity**:
– **M&P Shield 2.0**: Typically holds fewer rounds due to its single-stack magazine, often around 7-8+1 rounds in 9mm configuration.
– **M&P 2.0 Compact**: Offers a higher capacity with its double-stack design, usually around 15+1 rounds in 9mm.

3. **Intended Use**:
– **M&P Shield 2.0**: Ideal for users prioritizing concealability and ease of carry. It is favored for personal defense when the smallest profile is needed.
– **M&P 2.0 Compact**: Strikes a balance between concealability and firepower, suitable for those who want more capacity and potentially better control due to the larger grip area.

Overall, the choice between the two depends on the user’s priorities regarding size and capacity for their specific use case.

Is the M&amp,P 2.0 compact good for concealed carry?

The M&P 2.0 Compact is generally considered a good option for concealed carry. It offers a balance between size and capacity, typically featuring a compact frame that is easier to conceal while still providing a comfortable grip and a sufficient number of rounds. The M&P series is well-regarded for its reliability, ergonomics, and build quality, making it a popular choice among concealed carry permit holders. However, the suitability for concealed carry can vary based on personal preference, body type, and how you plan to carry it, so it’s recommended to try handling one to ensure it meets your needs.

Which is more reliable, Glock or Smith and Wesson?

Both Glock and Smith & Wesson are reputable firearms manufacturers, and the reliability of their products can depend on several factors, including the specific model, maintenance, and intended use.

**Glock:**
– Known for simplicity, durability, and a reliable firing mechanism.
– Popular with law enforcement and military around the world.
– Generally has fewer moving parts, which can contribute to reliability.

**Smith & Wesson:**
– Offers a broad range of firearms including revolvers and semi-automatic pistols.
– Known for high-quality craftsmanship and reliability, especially in revolvers.
– Their M&P series is popular among law enforcement and civilian users alike for reliability.

For most users, both brands are considered reliable. The choice might ultimately come down to personal preference, specific needs, and comfort with the firearm. It’s always recommended to test and maintain the firearm properly for optimal performance.

Why did the FBI choose Glock?

The FBI chose Glock pistols primarily due to their reliability, durability, and performance. Glocks are known for their simplicity in design, ease of use, and low maintenance requirements, making them well-suited for law enforcement use. Their polymer construction makes them lightweight yet robust, and they have a high ammunition capacity compared to other pistols. Additionally, Glock pistols have a reputation for functioning well in various environmental conditions, which is crucial for law enforcement operations. The FBI’s decision was also influenced by cost-effectiveness and the favorable results from extensive testing and evaluation processes that demonstrated Glock’s ability to meet the agency’s specific requirements.

What does M&amp,P stand for?

M&P typically stands for “Methods and Procedures.”

Is M&amp,P 2.0 reliable?

I don’t have specific information about M&P 2.0 as it is not clear what product or service this is referring to. To determine its reliability, you should check reviews, expert opinions, and user feedback. Additionally, consider any available performance metrics or benchmarks related to it.

Is the M&amp,P 2.0 single or double action?

The M&P (Military & Police) 2.0 is a striker-fired pistol, which means it operates in a manner similar to a single-action mechanism.

How many rounds does a M&amp,P 2.0 Compact hold?

The M&P 2.0 Compact typically holds 15 rounds in its standard magazine for 9mm models. However, capacity may vary based on the specific model and caliber.

Are M&amp,P and M&amp,P 2.0 magazines interchangeable?

No, M&P and M&P 2.0 magazines are not generally interchangeable. The M&P 2.0 series introduced several design changes that may affect magazine compatibility, such as different dimensions or features in the magazine catch and baseplate. It is recommended to use magazines specifically designed for each specific model to ensure proper fit and function. Always consult the manufacturer’s specifications or guidelines for your particular firearm model.

How many rounds does a M&amp,P Shield 2.0 9mm hold?

The M&P Shield 2.0 9mm typically holds 7 or 8 rounds in the magazine, depending on whether it is a flush-fit or extended magazine.

Is M&amp,P 2.0 reliable?

The reliability of M&P 2.0 would depend on the context in which it is being used, including factors such as user reviews, performance metrics, and expert evaluations specific to that version. To determine its reliability, one would need to consider technical assessments and user feedback. If you are inquiring about software or technology, checking online forums and reviews might provide helpful insights.

Why didn’t the military choose Glock?

The military’s choice in firearms, including the decision not to select Glock, can be influenced by several factors:

1. **Specifications and Requirements**: Military organizations have specific requirements and standards that must be met. These can include caliber, weight, capacity, ergonomics, durability, and compatibility with existing gear. Another firearm might have better met these requirements or offered additional features the military prioritized.

2. **Testing and Performance**: The military conducts extensive testing to evaluate the reliability, accuracy, and overall performance of firearms under various conditions. Other contenders might have performed better in these tests or proved to be more reliable.

3. **Cost and Budget**: Financial considerations play a significant role in procurement decisions. The cost of the firearm, including long-term maintenance and parts availability, can influence the decision. A more cost-effective option might have been selected over Glock.

4. **Existing Contracts and Relationships**: Sometimes existing relationships with manufacturers and existing contracts can sway the decision. If another manufacturer already had contracts with the military, it might have been easier or more cost-effective to continue with that supplier.

5. **Political and Strategic Considerations**: Decisions can sometimes be influenced by broader political or strategic concerns, including domestic manufacturing jobs, alliances, or strategic partnerships that align with national interests.

6. **Historical and Operational Preferences**: The military might have historical preferences or prior successful experiences with certain firearms, influencing their leaning toward alternatives to Glock.

Each of these factors, among others, could contribute to the decision not to choose Glock for military use.

What Glock is comparable to the M&amp,P Shield?

The Glock that is commonly considered comparable to the M&P Shield is the Glock 43. Both are compact, single-stack 9mm handguns designed for concealed carry and personal defense.