Is the M&,P 2.0 a good gun?
The Smith & Wesson M&P 2.0 is generally well-regarded among users for its reliability, ergonomics, and value. It offers features such as enhanced grip texture, a more robust trigger system compared to the original M&P, a variety of calibers and sizes, and a durable build. However, whether it is a “good” gun can depend on individual preferences and needs, such as intended use, hand size, and budget. It’s often recommended to handle and, if possible, test-fire any firearm to ensure it meets your personal standards and requirements.
Why M&,P 2.0 is better than Glock?
When comparing the M&P 2.0 and Glock handguns, preferences can vary widely based on individual needs and experiences. Here are some reasons why someone might prefer the M&P 2.0 over a Glock:
1. **Ergonomics**: The M&P 2.0 is often praised for its ergonomic design, which includes an aggressive grip texture and customizable backstraps that can offer a more comfortable and personalized grip than many Glock models.
2. **Trigger**: The M&P 2.0 features an improved trigger over its predecessor, offering a crisp break and a tactile reset, which some users might find superior to the Glock’s standard trigger feel.
3. **Aesthetics**: Stylistically, some users might prefer the appearance of the M&P 2.0, as it has a more modern look with a variety of color and finish options.
4. **Build Material**: The M&P 2.0 has a stainless steel chassis system that some might argue contributes to its durability and ability to handle recoil effectively.
5. **Versatility**: The M&P 2.0 line offers a range of models in various sizes and calibers, which could provide more options for users looking for a specific type of handgun.
6. **Price**: Depending on the model and customization, M&P 2.0 handguns can sometimes be more competitively priced than Glock models, making them an attractive option for budget-conscious buyers.
7. **Sight Options**: The M&P 2.0 often comes standard with better iron sight options, and some models include optics-ready variants that some users find advantageous over Glock’s offerings.
Ultimately, the “better” choice depends on the individual’s specific needs, preferences, and intended use. It is advisable to handle and, if possible, test fire both models to make an informed decision based on personal experience.
Is the M&,P 2.0 discontinued?
The M&P 2.0 has not been discontinued.
Is the M&,P Shield 2.0 a good gun?
The M&P Shield 2.0 is generally considered a good firearm, particularly for concealed carry. It is praised for its reliability, compact size, comfortable grip, improved trigger over its predecessor, and overall build quality. Its ease of use, combined with the options for 9mm, .40 S&W, and .45 ACP calibers, make it a popular choice among both new and experienced shooters. However, as with any firearm, personal preference and intended use should be considered, and it’s recommended to try it out to see if it fits your needs.
Is Smith and Wesson more reliable than Glock?
Determining whether Smith & Wesson is more reliable than Glock, or vice versa, can depend on various factors, including personal experiences, specific models, and criteria for reliability (such as frequency of malfunctions, ease of maintenance, etc.). Both manufacturers produce firearms that are widely used and respected in law enforcement, military, and civilian contexts.
1. **Smith & Wesson**:
– Known for their revolvers and semi-automatic pistols.
– Models like the M&P series are praised for ergonomics and reliability.
2. **Glock**:
– Renowned for their polymer-framed pistols.
– The Glock 17, for instance, is famed for its robustness and ease of use.
Ultimately, reliability may vary with individual firearms and usage conditions. If you’re considering a purchase, it might be helpful to research specific models, read reviews, and possibly test the firearms if you have access to a range that rents them. Additionally, consider consulting with professionals or enthusiasts who have experience with both brands.
How many rounds can a M&,P 2.0 hold?
The M&P (Military & Police) 2.0 series from Smith & Wesson comes in various models and calibers, each with differing capacities. For instance:
– The M&P 2.0 Compact in 9mm typically holds 15 rounds.
– The M&P 2.0 Full Size in 9mm usually holds 17 rounds.
– The .40 S&W versions typically hold fewer rounds, like 13 for Compact and 15 for Full Size.
– The .45 ACP versions might hold around 10 rounds, depending on the model.
It’s essential to check the specific model as capacities can vary based on magazine size and local regulations.
What ammo does a M&,P 2.0 use?
The M&P 2.0 typically uses 9mm ammunition, though it is available in other calibers such as .40 S&W and .45 ACP. It’s important to check the specific model to confirm the correct ammunition type.
Is the M&,P 2.0 single or double action?
The M&P 2.0 is a striker-fired pistol, which means it operates using a double-action mechanism.
Why didn’t the military choose Glock?
The military’s decision not to choose Glock for its standard service pistol can be attributed to several factors:
1. **Competition and Testing Requirements**: The selection process for military firearms involves rigorous testing and evaluation based on specific criteria such as reliability, durability, accuracy, and compatibility with existing equipment. Other manufacturers may have met these criteria more effectively.
2. **Budget and Contractual Decisions**: Budget constraints and contractual considerations can significantly influence procurement decisions. Competitors might offer better financial terms or package deals that include maintenance and training.
3. **Specific Requirements**: The military may have had specific requirements or preferences that Glock pistols did not fully meet. This could include features like modularity, safety mechanisms, or adaptability.
4. **Historical Agreements**: Sometimes historical agreements or long-standing relationships with other manufacturers can influence the decision-making process.
Each military procurement decision involves complex considerations, and the reasons can vary based on the specific context and needs of the respective military force.
What does M&,P stand for?
M&P stands for Methods and Procedures.
Who owns Smith and Wesson?
Smith & Wesson is owned by Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc., which is a publicly traded company. Being publicly traded means that ownership is distributed among the shareholders who own the company’s stock.
Is the M&,P 2.0 full-size?
Yes, the M&P 2.0 is available in a full-size model. The M&P (Military and Police) 2.0 series by Smith & Wesson includes a variety of models, including full-size, compact, and subcompact options.
Is the M&,P 2.0 good for concealed carry?
The Smith & Wesson M&P 2.0 is generally considered a good option for concealed carry. It offers features such as a slim profile, lightweight design, and ergonomic grip, which make it suitable for carrying discreetly. Additionally, it comes in various sizes, with the compact version being particularly popular for concealed carry purposes. It’s always important to test any firearm personally to ensure it meets your specific needs and preferences regarding comfort, ease of use, and concealability.
Do police use Smith and Wesson M&,P?
Yes, many police departments use Smith & Wesson M&P (Military & Police) firearms. The M&P line, particularly the M&P9 and M&P40 models, are popular among law enforcement agencies due to their reliability, ergonomics, and performance.
Is the Smith and Wesson SD9 2.0 a good gun?
The Smith and Wesson SD9 2.0 is generally considered a reliable and affordable option for a 9mm handgun. It is appreciated for its durability, decent ergonomics, and straightforward design, making it suitable for self-defense and basic shooting needs. However, opinions on firearms can vary widely based on personal preference, intended use, and experience. It’s recommended to handle and, if possible, test-fire the gun to determine if it meets your specific requirements. Additionally, reading reviews and consulting with firearm experts or enthusiasts can provide further insights into its performance and reliability.
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.